With this 100% FREE online password encryption utility program, you can protect your websites from being hacked.
This free online Password Encryption Utility tool has been made available to you by The SUPERSEOPLUS in order to assist you in warding off hackers and protecting your website. We are aware that simply having a password does not ensure that a website is secure; nevertheless, if you create a robust password and encrypt it, you will be able to take steps toward securing your website.
It is already a requirement for modern web apps to encrypt the passwords of its users in order to protect such users from hackers who may access all of the information, including sensitive personal data, stored in the user's account.
Because website owners always want to attract more users, we treat their passwords as if they were the key to their privacy. In order to acquire their trust, all website owners need to recognise and respect the fact that passwords are the key to users' privacy.
At SUPERSEOPLUS, we offer you access to a variety of free online tools that can assist you in protecting your website from malicious users. The Password Encryption Utility and the Password Strength Checker are their respective names.
To generate a secure password, you need just run it through our Password Strength Checker before encrypting it with our Password Encryption Tool. This will be your only step in the process.
In the past, safeguarding a website from hackers required a significant amount of laborious effort. This was done to ensure that all of the information pertaining to the website's users was kept safe and would not be compromised.
But despite this, there are still instances in which hackers can discover a means to collect crucial information about the users of the system. Because of this, we felt the need to create this one-of-a-kind password encryption tool; our goal is to assist website proprietors in ensuring that all of the valuable data stored on their websites is protected.
The standard Data Encryption Standard (DES), the Message Digest 5 (MD5), and the Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA-1) are the three encryption ciphers that our Password Encryption Utility program employs.
The standard makes use of an encryption method that is based on Unix DES, whereas MD5 makes use of a hash string that contains a 32-character hexadecimal integer and SHA-1 makes use of the United States Secure Hash Algorithm 1. When it comes to digesting passwords, the MD5 and SHA-1 algorithms are both suitable options; nevertheless, there are some scenarios in which using either of these algorithms is not enough.
Is it possible for someone to access my password?
Nobody other than the user has the right to know the user's password, not even the webmaster or the owner of the website, and this includes the user. In the event that the user has forgotten his or her password, he or she should request that the password be reset.
After that, a new temporary password will be sent to the user's email address, along with a message requesting that the user change the password as soon as possible for increased security.
The Encryption Process, Including the Algorithm and the Rules
When a program is utilized for the purpose of password encryption, it is imperative that specific guidelines be adhered to. The first type of algorithm is the one that encrypts passwords by means of a one-way process or digest; the user is unable to decrypt a password that has been encrypted using this method.
The second guideline is to compare digests rather than unencrypted texts when trying to match input passwords with preserved passwords. As an illustration of this, when a user signs in with his or her password, the system will digest the user's input using the same technique that was used when the user initially set up that password.
The program will then compare the two passwords to see if there is a match; if there is, the password that was entered can be judged to be legitimate.
The digest algorithms that were discussed are all well-known and generally used algorithms; hence, in order to further assist website owners in the process of safeguarding their account, there are two notions that are frequently utilized; these are the salt and the iteration count.
The user's password is given an additional set of bytes in the form of the salt before it is used to perform the digesting process. Because of this, the digests that are generated are different from what they would be if we simply encrypted the password, and as a result, it can protect us against attacks that were not intended.
Two distinct approaches are open to us when we use salt, and they are as follows:
Fixed-Salt is a string of bytes that is typically utilized by our organization for the process of digesting each password. It is possible to conceal this salt and think of it as an additional layer of defense, but doing so may also leave our system more vulnerable to birthday attacks and other kinds of attacks that target our password database in general.
If you choose to conceal this salt, you have the choice to do so. In a configuration known as a fixed-salt, having a weak user can frequently result in a weak password system as a whole.
The usage of variable salt is an approach that is seen as a more secure choice since the salt can be dispensed in any particular order.
This is formed or calculated independently for each password that is being digested, and it enables each of the saved passwords to be dissociated from the others, which enables a stronger protection and highly secured passwords to be constructed.
Because it will be far more difficult for the adversary to determine what the salt is, the use of a random or variable salt is recommended in the majority of situations. The only drawback is that we will be need to store it in an unencrypted form with the digest in order to ensure that we can retrieve it if it is ever required.
On the other hand, if you still want to keep some aspects of the salt hidden, the most effective strategy would be a combination of the two methods (fixed-salt and variable salt). Taking into view that just the random bytes are being saved undigested along with the result of the digest, this indicates that the salt you have consists of both a fixed secret portion as well as a random one.
The third guideline stipulates that we must adhere to the fact that the minimum size of salt that is recommended is 8 bytes. If you choose to employ a hybrid approach, then you need to ensure that at least 8 bytes of it are generated at random.
The iteration count refers to the number of times the hash function that we are digesting is also applied to its own output. This occurs at regular intervals throughout the process. It is advised that at least 1,000 iterations be performed in order to get the highest possible level of safety.
Copyright © 2024 SUPERSEOPLUS Free Premium SEO Tools. All Rights Reserved.
